Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Nancy Nafuna v Ayub Sabet Wekesa

Nafuna v Wekesa (Succession Appeal 5 of 2021) [2022] KEHC 2984 (KLR) (27 June 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 2984 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT KAKAMEGA SUCCESSION APPEAL 5 OF 2021 PJO OTIENO, J JUNE 27, 2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF MANOAH LUMASAYI (DECEASED) BETWEEN NANCY NAFUNA ................................................................................... APPELLANT AND AYUB SABET WEKESA ...................................................................... RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have looked at and perused the application dated 7.11.2021 which essentially seek the maintenance of status quo pending appeal. 2. I have also perused the file and noted that the proceedings are ready and certified. 3. Accordingly, I do admit the appeal and direct that it be heard by way of written submissions. 4. Let the Appellant file and serve Record of appeal together with submissions within thirty (30) days from today to enable the Respondent also file and serve submissions within thirty (30) days after service. 5. Time is of essence. 6. Let these directions be notified to the Appellant and the Respondent within seven (7) days from today. 7. Mention on 4.10.2022 to confirm compliance. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED IN OPEN COURT THIS 27TH DAY OF JUNE 2022. PATRICK J. O. OTIENO JUDGE In the presence of: https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/2984/eng@2022-06-27 1

page 1 of 2

No appearance for the Appellant No appearance for the Respondent Court Assistant: Kulubi https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/2984/eng@2022-06-27 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.