Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Eric Wamithi Waruguru

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KIAMBU CRIMINAL CASE NO. E047 OF 2021 BETWEEN REPUBLIC.................................................................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS ERIC WAMITHI WARUGURU.....................................................................ACCUSED RULING 1. The accused, ERIC WAMITHI WRUGURU was charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 of as read with Section 204 of the penal code. Particulars are that on 30th day of August, 2021 at about 11.00 hours at Kahawa Wendani within Ruiru Sub-county within Kiambu County the accused murdered Eunice Wanjiru Ndungu. The accused denied the charge. When the charge was read and particulars explained to him on 3/11/2021, he pleaded not guilty. The court ordered pre-bail report to be prepared and the report was filed in court on 8th December, 2021. 2. On 26/1/2022 the prosecutor informed court that they are not opposed to accused being released on bond. 3. I have perused the probation officer’s report. I note from the report that the victim’s family are opposed to accused being granted bond on ground that he may interfere with witnesses. They are of the view that he should be granted bond after the key witnesses have testified. 4. The family members are willing to deposit title deed in court to secure accused’s release and are willing to accommodate him at his home in Juja sub-county if released on bond. They prayed for reasonable bond terms. 5. I also note from the request that the accused has no previous criminal records. 6. There is no doubt that the victim’s family are pained by the loss of their kin and are not comfortable with accused being out on bond. They cited interference of witnesses as a reason for their objection. I have not however seen in the report any affidavit by the investigating officer in respect to likelihood of the accused interfering with witnesses. The prosecutor has not raised any objection to accused being released on bond. 7. From the foregoing, I find that no compelling reasons have been advanced to warrant accused being denied bond. 8. I therefore order that accused may be released on bond of Kshs.1m with one surety of similar amount. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2022. RACHEL NGETICH JUDGE Coram: Court Assistant : Kinyua For DPP :- Ms. Gacharia

page 1 of 2

For Accused :- Mr. Kimamo Accused : Present COURT RULING delivered virtually. RACHEL NGETICH JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.