REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E006 OF 2022 CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J KEVIN OTIENO OGEJO.................1ST APPLICANT KEVIN OTIENO ONJIKO.............2ND APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.........................................RESPONDENT (Being an Application arising from conviction and sentence of Siaya High Court in Criminal Case No. 7 of 2021) RULING 1. I have considered the application filed on 20/1/2022 seeking leave to file appeal out of time and as a pauper. 2. There is no evidence of pauperism and no explanation is given for the delay in filing the appeal upon being convicted and sentenced on 13/11/2021. 3. In addition, the 1st applicant herein Kevin Otieno Ogejo during the trial had engaged a paid advocate and therefore the question of pauperism does not arise. 4. Similarly, the question of his family abandoning him is far-fetched as he was all along during his trial surrounded by supportive family members who paid an advocate to represent him and he kept telling the court that his vehicle was being held by the police. 5. The 2nd Applicant Kelvin Otieno Ogejo too was represented by a probono advocate. There is no reason why he did not appeal in time. I find the joint application not merited. It is hereby dismissed. 6. File closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2022 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.