Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Joseph Owino Otieno v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E016 OF 2022 CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J JOSEPH OWINO OTIENO..............................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.....................................................................................RESPONDENT (Being an Application arising from conviction and sentence of the High Court at Siaya in Criminal Case No. 20 of 2020) RULING 1. On 29/9/2020, this court sentenced the accused person herein Joseph Owino Otieno to serve 20 years imprisonment upon finding him guilty of the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203 as read with 204 of the Penal Code. 2. The accused says that he has not appealed against conviction and sentence but wants revision of sentence because he is rehabilitated and wants the court to also take into account the period served in prison remand custody of 4 years. 3. I have considered the application which is not even supported by a sworn affidavit. 4. I observe that in paragraph 16 of the Ruling on sentence, I made it clear that the prison term of 20 years was to be calculated from the date of arrest of the accused person. 5. I however observe that the warrant of committal of sentence as signed by the Deputy Registrar does not state that the sentence was to be calculated from the date of arrest. 6. Accordingly, I direct that the Deputy Registrar do reissue the warrant of committal to prison to reflect the Ruling on sentence rendered on 29/9/2020. 7. I so direct. File closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.