Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2170 of 2022

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CRIMINAL PETITION NO. E028 OF 2021 ALBERT BARASA MUKOMESI ........... PETITIONER -VERSUSREPUBLIC ............................................... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT The Petition before me sought two reliefs, namely; (a) An order that the period which the petitioner spent in custody whilst he was still on trial, be taken into account when the prison authorities were computing the actual duration of the sentence; (b) An order that the petitioner serves the remainder of the sentence on Probation. 1. The learned State Counsel, Ms M. Odumba conceded that the Petitioner was entitled to the benefit of Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. 2. The Respondent was right to have made that concession, as the proviso to Section 333 (2) obligates the Court to take into account the time which a person had spent in custody, when he was still on trial. 3. In this case, the Petitioner spent 5 Months and 23 Days in custody, during the time when he was still undergoing trial. Therefore, I do now order that when the Prison authorities were computing the actual duration of the sentence which the Petitioner should serve in jail, the said authorities must give credit for the said 5 Months and 23 Days. 4. Meanwhile, the request that the Petitioner be allowed to serve the remainder of the sentence on Probation, I find that that is not a legal right bestowed by statute. My finding is based upon the constrast between the 2 reliefs sought herein. On the one hand, the rights under Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code are spelt out in express and mandatory terms. 5. On the other hand, the question as to whether or not the Petitioner would be entitled to demand that he be allowed to serve the balance of the sentence, on Probation, cannot be demanded as a justiciable right. The fact that the Petitioner may have less than 3 years left, out of the sentence of 20 years imprisonment, cannot as a matter of right give rise to an entitlement that he should serve the balance of the sentence on probation. 6. In this case, the Petitioner failed to provide the Court with sufficient information and justification to warrant the issuance of an order that the balance of the sentence be served on Probation. 7. However, as already stated earlier, the period of 5 Months and 23 Days are to be taken into account when calculating the actual duration to be spent in prison, whilst serving the sentence. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 16TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2022 FRED A. OCHIENG JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.