Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rams George Opee v The Inspector General of The Police & 5 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT HOMA BAY PETITION NO. 11 OF 2020 RAMS GEORGE OPEE............................................................................. PETITIONER VERSUS THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE POLICE............................1 ST RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS...................2ND RESPONDENT THE OFFICER IN CHARGE OYUGIS POLICE STATION...........3RD RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS .......................... 4TH RESPONDENT INDEPENDENT POLICING OVERSIGHT AUTHORITY ........... 5TH RESPONDENT THE HON. ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................................. 6 TH RESPONDENT RULING 1. The fifth respondent herein moved the court by way of Notice of Motion dated 10th December, 2020 and is seeking the following orders: a) That this honourable court be pleased to strike out the name of the fifth respondent from the petition as the fifth respondent is improperly joined as a party to the petition. b) That the petitioner do pay costs of the application and of the suit to the fifth respondent. 2. The application was premised on the following grounds: a) That the fifth respondent has been wrongfully enjoined in the petition. b) That the petitioner has not demonstrated the violation or threatened violation of his fundamental rights and the manner in which his rights have been violated by the fifth respondent. c) That the petition does not disclose any reasonable cause of action against the fifth respondent as no orders are sought against the fifth respondent and as such, the petition is mischievous, misconceived and an abuse of the due process of the court. d) That the name of the fifth respondent should be struck out with costs. 3. The application was opposed on grounds that the fifth respondent has a duty to investigate the complaints by the petitioner. 4. The fifth respondent is created under section 3 (1) of the Independent Policing Oversight Authority Act, 2011 which states: 1) There is hereby established an Authority to be known as the Independent Policing Oversight Authority. 5. One of the objectives of the fifth respondent is provided under section 5 (a) in the following terms: The objectives of the Authority shall be to:

page 1 of 2

a) hold the Police accountable to the public in the performance of their functions; Accountability to the public is very key objective for the creation of the fifth respondent. In as much no breach of the rights of the applicant have not been attributed to the authority, in the event that the petition is allowed, the 5 th respondent may be asked to ensure that the actions of the police are investigated and the culprits made to account. I therefore find that the fifth respondent was properly enjoined, 6. The application by the fifth respondent is hereby dismissed. Each party to meet own costs. DELIVERED AND SIGNED AT HOMA BAY THIS 28TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2022 KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.