Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Daniel Otieno Oloo v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E033 OF 2022 CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J DANIEL OTIENO OLOO.....................................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.........................................................................................................RESPONDENT (Being an Application arising from conviction and sentence of the High Court at Siaya in HCCRA No. 44A of 2018 AND originally from Siaya Magistrates’ Court in Cr. Case No. 3/2018) RULING 1. I have considered the application that the applicant’s sentence to take into account the period spent in custody. 2. I observe that the applicant is a convict in Siaya PM Cr. Case No. 3/2018 wherein he was convicted and sentenced to serve life imprisonment by Hon. James Ong’ondo, PM on 24/8/2018. 3. He appealed before this court vide HCRA 44A of 2018 which appeal against conviction was dismissed on 6/10/2020. 4. The Judgment on appeal on sentence is clear that the sentence was reduced to 30 years’ imprisonment from the indefinite life imprisonment, and the term sentence was to be calculated from 31/12/2017 the date of arrest of the appellant. 5. That being the case, it is clear that this court has exhausted its jurisdiction on matters sentence, having resentenced him to a lesser severe sentence and taken into account the period served in remand custody pending trial. The court cannot revisit a matter it conclusively handled. 6. Accordingly, this application is found to be devoid of merit. It is hereby dismissed. 7. File closed. Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya this 23rd Day of March, 2022 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.