Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Muriuki Ngatia v The Attorney-general

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NANYUKI JUDICIAL REVIEW NO E002 OF 2021 JAMES MURIUKI NGATIA...........APPLICANT VERSUS THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL.....RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Ex Parte Applicant herein, JAMES MURIUKI NGATIA, has applied by chamber summons dated 15/07/2021 under Order 53, Rules 1, 2 & 3 of the Civil Procedure Rules, 2010 for leave of the court to apply for judicial review. The relief to be sought is an order of mandamus to compel the Attorney-General of the Republic of Kenya to satisfy the decree in Nanyuki, CMCC No 14 of 2007. 2. I have read the Statement of Facts and the Verifying Affidavit filed together with the application. I have also considered the submissions of the learned counsel appearing. I will in the circumstances grant the leave sought. 3. Let the substantive application be filed as provided for in the rules. Costs of this application shall be in that substantive application. It is so ordered. DATED AND SIGNED AT NANYUKI THIS 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2022 H P G WAWERU JUDGE DELIVERED AT NANYUKI THIS 21ST DAY OF APRIL 2022

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.