Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 701 of 2022

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISCELLANEOUS SUCCESSION APPLICATION NO. E008 OF 2022 CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF DISHON WAROM (DECEASED) AND JOAB ONYANGO WAROM...........PETITIONER/APPLICANT RULING 1. I have considered the application dated 23/3/2022, under Certificate of urgency. I certify it as urgent. On the merits thereof, although this is a matter to be considered ex parte, I observe as follows: 2. That the applicant in Prayer No. 2 seeks for grant of Letters of Administration ad litem limited for purposes of filing suit against the National Social Security Fund Board of Trustees, the former employer of the deceased for the payment of severance pay, PAYE and other benefits payable. 3. However, in the grounds in support of that prayer, the supporting affidavit and certificate of urgency, the applicant claims that the purpose of the limited grant as sought is to enable the applicant institute suit against Joab Odeny Ogato who sought eviction of the applicant from North Gem/Siriwo/806 through Civil Suit No. 35 of 2018 (309/2017 Kisumu) before the Magistrate’s court at Siaya on 7/9/2017 for a declaration that he is a bona fide proprietor of the land parcel No. North Gem/Siriwo/806 and a permanent injunction restraining the applicant from occupying the said parcel of land. 4. The applicant continues to aver that the court on 18/4/2019 issued an order requiring the applicant and the 1 st Respondent to vacate land parcel No. LR No. North Gem/Siriwo/806. 5. That subsequently, and without being moved, the same court on 3/9/2020 issued an eviction order against the applicant from the above named land and that he is now at risk of being evicted from the said parcel of land and he is at the mercy of the OCS. 6. No doubt, there is no relationship between the prayers being sought by the applicant and the reasons or grounds in support thereof. It would appear that the applicant copy pasted the application. This court is unable to link the orders sought, their purpose and the grounds. 7. I decline to grant the prayers sought. The application for limited grant - ad litem is declined and dismissed for being incongruent with the grounds in support and the supporting affidavit. 8. The applicant is however not barred from filing a proper application in a different file, for consideration by this court. 9. File closed. 10. I so order. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 29TH DAY OF MARCH, 2022 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.