Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Sebastian Miriti v Republic

Miriti v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application 162 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 577 (KLR) (12 May 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 577 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MERU MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION 162 OF 2022 TW CHERERE, J MAY 12, 2022 BETWEEN SEBASTIAN MIRITI ............................................................................... APPLICANT AND REPUBLIC ............................................................................................ RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant was convicted of 4 counts in Tigania PMCR. Case. 290 of 2014 and was sentenced to serve 15 years in each count. 2. Applicant preferred an appeal in Meru Cr. Appeal NO. 99 of 1999 and the sentences were reduced to 5 years to run concurrently. 3. Applicant seeks a review of the sentence on the grounds that he suffers from diabetes, is first time offender and his family is suffering due to his incarceration. 4. Applicant’s sentence was reviewed in Meru Cr. Appeal No. 99 of 1999 and an invitation for this court to further review the sentence amounts to ask the court to sit on appeal in its own judgement which jurisdiction this court does not possess. 5. From the foregoing analysis, I have come to the conclusion that the Notice of Motion filed on March 16, 2022 is an abuse of the court and it is disallowed. DELIVERED AT MERU THIS 12TH DAY OF MAY 2022 T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Appearances Court Assistant - Kinoti https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/577/eng@2022-05-12 1

page 1 of 2

Applicant - Present For Applicant - Mr. Nyenyire Advocate For the State - Ms. Mwaniki https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/577/eng@2022-05-12 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.