Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Rmo v Registration of Births and Deaths & 2 others

RMO v Registration of Births and Deaths & 2 others (Miscellaneous Cause E027 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 429 (KLR) (Family) (26 May 2022) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 429 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT NAIROBI (MILIMANI LAW COURTS) FAMILY MISCELLANEOUS CAUSE E027 OF 2022 AO MUCHELULE, J MAY 26, 2022 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT, NO. 8 OF THE LAWS OF KENYA AND IN THE MATTER OF INSERTION/ADDITION OF PARTICULARS IN THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE OF NC MINOR) AND IN THE MATTER OF REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATH DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL REGISTRATION, NAIROBI BETWEEN RMO ........................................................................................................... APPLICANT AND REGISTRATION OF BIRTHS AND DEATHS .......................... 1ST RESPONDENT DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL REGISTRATION ........................... 2ND RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL ............................................................... 3RD RESPONDENT https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/429/eng@2022-05-26 1

page 1 of 2

RULING 1. It is not in dispute that the minor NC was born on 26th May 2012 at the Kenyatta National Hospital. Its mother CCK died on 20th May 2014. The father RMO (the applicant) is therefore the only surviving parent. The issue of paternity was dealt with following DNA analysis by KEMRI whose results have been annexed as “RMD1”. The child was left with the grandparents, but following the applicant’s Children Cause No 932 of 2018 at the Children Court at Nairobi against them, the court granted the applicant legal and actual custody. He was ordered to take over full parental responsibility over the child, including its education. The grandparents were given access to the child. 2. The present originating summons by the applicant sought an order directing the Registrar of Births and Deaths and Department of Civil Registration (the 1st and 2nd respondents) to add his name in the child’s birth certificate as the father. At the time of the birth of the child only its mother’s name had been indicated. 3. I directed that the summons be served on the respondents and also on the Attorney General (3rd respondent) which was done. There was no response from them. 4. I consider that it is in the best interest of the child (under Article 53(2) of the Constitution and section 4(2) and (3) of the Children Act) to have the name of its father included in her birth certificate. She has a right to identify with the father. 5. Consequently, I allow the application and direct the Principal Registrar of Births and Deaths to correct the particulars in the child’s birth certificate by including the name of the applicant as the father of the child. 6. I make no order as to costs. DATED AND DELIVERED AT NAIROBI THIS 26 TH DAY OF MAY 2022 A.O. MUCHELULE JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2022/429/eng@2022-05-26 2

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.