Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 9730 of 2021

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KERUGOYA CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. E 010 OF 2020 LUKA CHEPKONGA KIMUGE....................................................APPLICANT – VS – REPUBLIC....................................................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The accused is charged with the offence of Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. He has applied to be released on bond. The Prosecution has no compelling reasons to oppose bail. 2. Bail is a Constitutional right to an accused person under Article 49(1)(h) of the Constitution. 3. If no compelling reasons for the prosecution to oppose such bail, it ought to be granted on reasonable terms. Such terms are dedusable from the nature and seriousness of the offence. 4. The offence of murder is a very serious offence. However, the presumption of innocence of the accused is a factor to be considered by the court in an effort to decide the terms that ought to be attached to the bail/bail if granted. Each case is therefore to be decided upon its peculiar circumstances. 5. I have considered the circumstances under which the offence is alleged to have been committed, and that the Prosecution has no compelling reasons for denial of bail. I therefore admit the accused to bond/bail on the following terms: 1. He shall be released upon signing a bond of Kshs 350,000/- or, upon 2. Cash bail in the sum of Kshs 250,000/-, being deposited into court. 3. He shall not interfere with witnesses during pendency of the case. 4. He shall attend court as and when required to attend. Delivered, Dated and Signed at Kerugoya this 15th day of January 2021. J. N. MULWA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.