Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Vulimu Mbaja v Anvi Emporium Limited & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA CIVIL APPEAL NO. 155 OF 2018 (Being an appeal from the original judgment and decree of Hon. RM Ogal, Principal Magistrate, of 30 th October 2018 in Hamisi PMCCC No. 23 of 2017) JAMES VULIMU MBAJA................................................................APPELLANT VERSUS ANVI EMPORIUM LIMITED................................................1 ST RESPONDENT JOANNES OGENDO OMUOM..............................................2 ND RESPONDENT RULING 1. Am unable to finalize preparation of the judgment that am supposed to write herein as the original court file in Hamisi PMCCC No. 23 of 2017 has not been availed. 2. I note that there is a record of appeal on record, but it is a mandatory requirement in civil appeals, from a magistrate’s court, that the original trial records be availed for review by the appellate court. It would be dereliction of duty on my part if I were to proceed to determine the appeal herein without sight of the original trial record. 3. Consequently, I direct the Deputy Registrar to call for the original trial records. 4. The matter shall be mentioned thereafter for allocation of a fresh date for judgment. 5. The appeal arose from a trial at the Hamisi Principal Magistrate’s Court. The Chief Justice recently gazetted the Vihiga High Court and placed the Hamisi magistrate’s court under its supervision. 6. Consequently, I direct that this matter be transferred to the High Court registry at Vihiga, for compliance with the directions given in paragraphs 3 and 4 above. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2021 W. MUSYOKA JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.