REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. E1133 OF 2020 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF MANDAMUS BETWEEN REPUBLIC..........................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS KENYA MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS AND DENTIST BOARD............................................1ST RESPONDENT KISUMU SPECIALISTS HOSPITAL......................2ND RESPONDENT ATTORNEY GENERAL............................................3RD RESPONDENT EX PARTE APPLICANT: MARTIN OTIENO NGAYO RULING 1. On 17th November 2020, this Court granted the ex parte Applicant leave to commence proceedings judicial review proceedings against the Respondents for an order of mandamus, and directed the ex parte Applicant to file and serve the substantive Notice of Motion within twentyone (21) days. 2. Upon perusal of the court record, I note that there has been no compliance by the ex parte Applicant. The 2 nd Respondent has on its part filed a replying affidavit to the application for leave, which had already been decided ex parte by the Court. 3. In the circumstances, as there is no substantive cause pending before this Court for hearing, I hereby strike out this suit with no order as to costs. 4. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the ex parte Applicant and Respondents by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday, 28th January 2021. 5. Orders accordingly. DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 26th DAY OF JANUARY 2021 P. NYAMWEYA JUDGE
Original judgment
Republic v Kenya Medical Practitioners and Dentist Board & 2 others
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.