REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI JUDICIAL REVIEW MISCELLANOUS APPLICATION NO. E057 OF 2020 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF PROHIBITION AND CERTIORARI BETWEEN TAHERALI HASSANALI...................................................1 ST APPLICANT ZOEB EZZI..........................................................................2 ND APPLICANT VERSUS THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION.........1ST RESPONDENT CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S COURT, KIBERA LAW COURTS................................................2ND RESPONDENT RULING NO 2 1. This Court (Mativo J.), in a ruling delivered on 24 th August 2020, directed the Applicant herein to join the complainants in the criminal case commenced against them as interested parties, and to serve all the parties with the Amended application within seven( 7) days. On 7 th October 2020, when the matter came up for mention, the learned Judge noted that the Applicants had not complied, and granted them twentyone (21) days to comply, and in default, the suit would stand dismissed. 2. I have perused the Court record, and there is no record of any compliance by the Applicants. In effect, the outcome of the noncompliance is that there is no pending matter in this suit for determination by the Court. 3. In the premises I direct and order as follows: I. This suit is dismissed for non-prosecution and this file is hereby marked as closed. II. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of this ruling to the Applicants by electronic mail by close of business on Thursday, 21st January 2021. 4. Orders accordingly. DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 20TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 P. NYAMWEYA JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.