Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 7944 of 2021

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. E004 OF 2021 ORIGINATING FROM KISUMU CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. E005 OF 2021 JOSEPH OMONDI OCHIENG.....................................................1 ST PETITIONER MAURICE JUMA...........................................................................2 ND PETITIONER LUKE OCHOLLA...........................................................................3 RD PETITIONER WILLIAM ODUOR........................................................................4 TH PETITIONER SILAS OWITI..................................................................................5 TH PETITIONER VINCENT OTIENO........................................................................6 TH PETITIONER (Suing on their behalf and behalf of the membership of CHOPPIES ROUND ABOUT BODA BODA YOUTH GROUP, TUFFOAM MALL BODA BODA RIDER SELF HELP GROUP and all other affected owners of boda bodas, tuk tuks, taxis, private vehicles and traders within the City Centre and more specifically Oginga Odinga and Angawa Streets of KISUMU CITY Central Business District (CBD) IN KISUMU COUNTY) - VERSUS CITY MANAGER-KISUMU.........................................................1 ST RESPONDENT KISUMU CITY BOARD..............................................................2 ND RESPONDENT COUNTY GOVERNMENT OF KISUMU..................................3 RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the Petitioners/Applicants’ applications for leave to be heard during the recess and the Notice of motion all dated 29/3/2021 seeking for conservatory orders staying implementation of the one day Public Notice dated 19/2/2021 and effective on 22/2/2021 pending the hearing and determination of the Main Petition. (1) I grant leave to the Applicant/Petitioner to be heard during the recess. (2) On the motion for Conservatory orders, I observe that the impugned Notice is dated 19/2/2021 and was to take effect on 22/2/2021 which means it has already taken effect. 2. Granting any order staying the taking effect or implementation thereof will be futile as the application has come too late in the day for

page 1 of 2

exparte orders. 3. I therefore find no urgency involved in the Main motion. I decline to certify as urgent the application for Conservatory orders. 4. I direct the Petitioner/Applicant to serve the Respondents with the Petition and the application for interpartes consideration. Mention before the Duty Judge in the new term on 12/4/2021 for further Directions. 5. These proceedings/orders to be typed and submitted to Kisumu High Court forthwith. 6. This file is closed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA, THIS 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2021 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.