REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. E009 OF 2021 ORIGINATING FROM KAKAMEGA MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.E062 OF 2021 STEPHEN WESONGA MAKOKHA..................................1ST APPLICANT MOSES ADEPA.................................................................2 ND APPLICANT VERSUS IGNATIUS OPEMA MALIBA (as the Legal and Personal Representative of the estate ofANTONY GISIYE-DECEASED...................RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the application dated 25/3/2021 under Certificate of Urgency. 2. I grant leave to the Applicants to be heard during the recess. I further certify the application as urgent for consideration exparte in the first instance. 3. On the prayer for interim stay of execution, I observe that the temporary stay granted by the trial court lapsed on 29/3/2021 hence the execution process is due. 4. The Applicants seek for leave to appeal out of time and for stay of execution of decree pending the lodging, hearing and determination of the intended appeal. 5. So as not to lock the applicants out of the judgment seat should they justify the delay in filing the appeal, I hereby exercise discretion and grant the applicants stay of execution of decree in Mumias PMCC No. 188/2016 pending interpartes hearing of the application dated 25/3/2021. 6. The Applicants’ counsel to serve the Respondent’s counsel forthwith for interpartes hearing before the High Court at Kakamega on 13/4/2021. 7. This file is closed and proceedings and this ruling to be certified and send to the Deputy Registrar Kakamega High Court forthwith. 8. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA, THIS 30TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE
Original judgment
Stephen Wesonga Makokha & 1 other v Ignatius Opema Maliba (as the Legal and Personal Representative of the estate ofANTONY Gisiye-deceased
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.