Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Humphrey Wanyama v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ELDORET CRIMINAL PETITION NO 10 OF 2020 HUMPHREY WANYAMA..............................................................................PETITIONER VERSUS REPUBLIC....................................................................................................RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The petitioner (HUMPHREY WANYAMA) was convicted on a charge of robbery with violence contrary to Section 296 (2) of the Penal Code and sentenced to serve 30 years’ imprisonment in Eldoret CMCRC No. 326 of 2010. The victim VICTOR ODHIAMBO (a taxi operator) was robbed of his car make TOYOTA COROLLA, phone, radio and cash, the total value being 192,200 by that appellant and others who were armed with knives. The robbers had posed as customers who wanted to engage taxi hire services. 2. He appealed against the conviction and sentence in HCCrA No 158 of 2011 and the sentence was reduced on 24/09/2018 and substituted with a period of 15 years which was to run from the date of conviction. 3. He has now petitioned this court to revise the sentence and consider giving him a non-custodial sentence, saying he is remorseful and is fully rehabilitated. He has attached certificates showing the different skills including spiritual rehabilitation programmes he has acquired while in prison. A letter dated 28/05/2019 by the officer in charge of welfare at the Eldoret Main Prison describes the petitioner as hardworking, obedient, and with a high level of discipline. 4. In opposing the petition, Miss Okok on behalf of the DPP points out that after being sentenced in the lower court in 2 cases i.e. 326 of 2010 and 327 of 2010, the appellant filed HCCRA No 24 of 2012 which was dismissed in its entirety. He then filed Eld CrAppeal No 49 of 2017 before the Court of Appeal, and the sentence was reduced to 20 years. He then filed Misc CR Application No 180 of 2018, seeking to have sentences in the two cases consolidated, and this was dismissed by the High Court on grounds of lack of jurisdiction to interfere with the orders of the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal in CACr No 49 of 2017 in setting aside the death sentence in Eld CMCrC No 327 of 2010 ordered that the sentences were to run consecutively. 5. The petitioner does not dispute this chain of events. Much as I sympathize with his plights, this court cannot begin to revise what the superior court; directions and I need not delve more into the matter. The opposition to the petition is merited, and the petition be and is hereby dismissed. VIRTUALLY-DELIVERED AND DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 AT ELDORET H. A. OMONDI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.