Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Paul Muriuki Karoki v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAKURU CRIMINAL PETITION NUMBER 3 OF 2019 PAUL MURIUKI KAROKI.......................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC..............................................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The petitioner herein was charged, tried and found guilty of the offence of Robbery with Violence Contrary to Section 296(2) of the Penal Code in 589 of 2000. He was tried, convicted and sentenced to death. His appeals here and above were dismissed on 24 th February 2006 and 12th November 2015 respectively. 2. The petitioner herein filed undated Notice of Motion supported by his affidavit seeking orders; 1. THAT application be certified urgent and be heard on priority basis. 2. THAT the honorable court be pleased to hear a re- sentence and mete out the appropriate sentence. 3. He relies on the case cited as Wiliam Okungu Kittiny vs R [2018] eKLR and the principle laid out in the Muruatetu Case. 4. When the application was heard he urged this court to proceed and resentence him accordingly. 5. The state through Ms. Murunga pointed out that the applicant having been charged with robbery with violence, the rightful place for his application was before the Chief Magistrate. 6. The applicant in response pointed out that this court had recently resentenced other applicants facing similar situations. Those matters are cases where the matter was heard by this court i.e murder cases. For robbery with violence cases those matters were heard by the learned magistrates. The learned prosecuting counsel is right. 7. This is in line with the Supreme Court’s holding in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & another v Republic [2017] eKLR at paragraph 111 where it is stated: It is prudent for the same Court that heard this matter to consider and evaluate mitigating submissions and evaluate the appropriate sentence befitting the offence committed by the petitioners. 8. Without going into the merits of the application, I direct that the same be placed before the Chief Magistrate for hearing and determination. 9. The matter be mentioned before the Chief Magistrate on the 11 th May 2021 for directions. DATED AND DELIVERED VIA ZOOM THIS 27TH APRIL 2021. Mumbua T Matheka Judge In the presence of;

page 1 of 2

Edna Court Assistant For State: Ms Murunga Applicant: Present at Nakuru Main GK prison via ZOOM Mumbua T Matheka Judge

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.