Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Attorney General & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI JUDICIAL REVIEW APPLICATION NO. MISC. E057 OF 2021 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR LEAVE FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW ORDERS OF MANDAMUS AND PROHIBITION BETWEEN REPUBLIC......................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS ATTORNEY GENERAL.........................................1ST RESPONDENT THE DIRECTOR NATIONAL COUNCIL OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES..........................................2ND RESPONDENT THE POLICY UNIT TECHNICAL MANAGER KENYA REVENUE AUTHORITY........................3RD RESPONDENT EX PARTE APPLICANT: EDIN HASSAN IBRAHIM RULING 1. Edin Hassan Ibrahim, the ex parte Applicant herein, has moved this Court in an application brought by way of Chamber Summons dated 24th April 2021, in which he is seeking the following orders against the Respondents herein: 1. This application be certified urgent and be heard on a priority basis dispensing with service in the first instance due to its urgency. 2. Leave be granted to the Applicant to apply for: a. an ORDER OF MANDAMUS to compel the Director National Council of Persons With Disabilities and the Policy Unit Technical Manager Kenya Revenue Authority Nairobi Station to restore and or reinstate the applicant to his previous position as a member of the National Council Of Persons With Disabilities, and further exempt him from paying any accrued Income Tax, and to compensate the Applicant from the day of his removal in the Council to date. b. an ORDER OF PROHIBITION against the Respondents from interdicting, suspending or interfering, harassing, intimidating removing the Applicant name from the National Council of Persons With Disabilities and further subjecting the applicant any payment income tax. c. Damages arising from the matters herein and interest thereon. 3. If leave is granted, a direction that the hearing of the judicial review be expedited. 4. Costs of this Application and the entire proceedings be awarded to the Applicant.

page 1 of 2

2. The said application is supported a verifying affidavit and supporting affidavit both deponed to by the ex parte Applicant on 24th April 2021. Upon perusal of the application, I note that it is brought pursuant to the provisions of Order 53 of the Civil Procedure Rules. However, the ex parte Applicant has not filed a statement in support thereof as required by Order 53 Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Rules, neither are the grounds of the application stated. The application is therefore incompetently filed. 3. In the premises I hereby direct as follows: I. The ex parte Applicant is granted leave to file a statement in support of his Chamber Summons dated 24 th April 2021 within fourteen (14) days of today’s date. II. The Chamber Summons dated 24th April 2021 shall be heard on 10th May 2021. III. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall put this matter on the Division’s causelist for hearing by email on 10th May 2021. IV. The Deputy Registrar of the Judicial Review Division shall send a copy of these directions to the ex parte Applicant by electronic mail by close of business on Monday, 26th April 2021. V. Parties shall be at liberty to apply. 4. Orders accordingly. DATED AND SIGNED AT NAIROBI THIS 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2021 P. NYAMWEYA JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.