REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL AND TAX DIVISION HCCC NO. 333 OF 2013 ST ELIZABETH ACADEMY KAREN LTD..............PLAINTIFF VERSUS NATIONAL BANK OF KENYA LIMITED.....1ST DEFENDANT GA LIFE ASSURANCE LIMITED.................2ND DEFENDANT RULING 1. I have considered the affidavit of service dated 4 th May 2021 and I am satisfied that the law firms of Gichuki Kingara and Maganga Luseno for the plaintiffs and 1st defendants respectively were duly served with the mention notice for 10 th May 2021. 2. I also note that the plaintiffs were duly served with the application dated 6 th August 2015 and have not filed any response to it. 3. Accordingly and in the circumstances, I allow the application dated 6 th August 2015 as prayed. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIA MICROSOFT TEAMS AT NAIROBI THIS 13 TH DAY OF MAY 2021 IN VIEW OF THE DECLARATION OF MEASURES RESTRICTING COURT OPERATIONS DUE TO COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND IN LIGHT OF THE DIRECTIONS ISSUED BY HIS LORDSHIP, THE CHIEF JUSTICE ON THE 17 TH APRIL 2020. W. A. OKWANY JUDGE In the presence of: Ms Musau for Luseno for 1st defendant Ms Muthoni for Wambugu for plaintiff/respondent Mr. Lusi for 2nd defendant Court Assistant: Sylvia.
Original judgment
St Elizabeth Academy Karen Ltd & 1 other v National Bank of Kenya Limited & 1 other
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.