Davis C Kimenzu Muli v Beatrice Kalume Florence Kitonyo

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA CITATION CAUSE NO. E018 OF 2020 IN THE MATTER OF THE LATE TIMOTHY KILONZO KIVUMBU DAVIS C KIMENZU MULI.........................CITOR/APPLICANT VERSUS BEATRICE KALUME FLORENCE KITONYO..........................CITEE/RESPONDENTS RULING 1. Vide an Originating Summons dated 3 rd February 2012, the applicant sought to be issued with a grant of letters of administration in accordance with the prayer contained in the citation application dated 26 th November, 2020 in which he cited one Beatrice Kalume and Florence Kitonyo being wives ( widows ) to the late Timothy Kilonzo Kivumbu who died on 23 rd November, 2018 to show cause why they could not take a grant of letters of administration being the persons entitled in priority to do so. 2. The citor who claims beneficial interest in LR.No Kilifi/Kadzonzo/Madzimbani/1165 being part of the estate of the deceased intimated of his intention in taking out a grant of letters of administration in their place should they fail to do so. 3. The application is supported by averments contained in the verifying affidavits sworn on 5 th Febraruy,20218 and 20th November, by the citor stating that he and the deceased were the joint owners of the said land and that prior to the deceased’s death, they had obtained a title deed in their joint names. 4. He averred that, on 5 th May, 2020 he and the deceased got into a sale agreement in which he could purchase the deceased’s share out of the said land at kshs 2,300,000. That he paid the deceased in instalments totaling to Ksh 1,687,700 as at 28 th September, 2013 thus leaving a balance of Ksh 613,000. He attached various acknowledgements of receipt of the purchase price as annexure Dw4 and 5 . 5. He claimed that, the deceased having died before completing their sale transaction, the widows should take up the responsibility in completing the transaction by taking letters of administration. 6. Despite service of the citation, the citees did not respond nor file any petition for a grant of representation. When the matter came up for hearing, the citees were not present. A return of service was filed as proof of the said service hence the matter proceeded exparte. 7. I have considered the application herein which is not opposed. The purpose of citation proceedings in an intestate estate is intended at compelling persons entitled in priority to petition for a grant of representation but are reluctant or refused to do so upon being cited. See Josiah Muli Wambua (deceased) Nairobi Succession Cause No 2557/2012 (2014) eKLR where the court stated that; “In intestate, citation issues only in cases where no petition has been lodged in court. Citations are intended to trigger the process of applying for letters of administration intestate in circumstances where the persons entitled to apply are not willing or are slow in moving the court in that behalf. The citor should not be a person who has himself already applied for the grant, for the citor should only apply for the grant after the citee fails to apply” 8. In a similar situation in the case of In Re estate of Kiprono Sitenei (deceased) 2018) eKLR the court allowed a creditor (purchaser of deceased’s land) to petition for a grant of representation after the citees failed to do so. 9. Under Section 66 of the Law of Succession Act, a grant of letters of administration can issue in order of priority a follows; (a) surviving spouse or spouses, with or without association of other beneficiaries

page 1 of 2