Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

James Aggrey Mwamu T/A Mwamu & Company Advocates v The County Assembly of Migori

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT HOMA BAY MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 70 OF 2018 JAMES AGGREY MWAMU T/A MWAMU & COMPANY ADVOCATES.............................APPLICANT VERSUS THE COUNTY ASSEMBLY OF MIGORI...........................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The applicant moved the court by way of Notice of Motion dated 27 th June, 2019. It was brought under section 51 (2) of the Advocates Act and Rule 7 of the Advocates (remuneration) Order. He is seeking the following orders: a) That this court be pleased to convert the certificate of costs in the sum of Kshs.792,329/= into judgment. b) That upon grant of prayer 1 above, interest do accrue on the taxed costs at 14% per annum with effect from 11 th December, 2018 till payment in full. c) That the costs of this application be awarded to the applicant. 2. The application was premised on the following grounds: a) That the representation/retainer is not disputed. b) That the applicant’s costs were taxed on 11th December, 2018 and a certificate of costs has been issued. c) That the certificate is yet to be set aside, reviewed and/or varied. d) That the taxed costs remain unsettled to date. e) That the application is made in good faith. 3. The respondent opposed the application. Sixteen grounds were raised that I have summarized as follows: a) That the services of the applicant were illegally procured. b) That the respondent does not have the capacity to sue or be sued. c) That the retainer is disputed. 4. I have looked at the record of the original matter that gave rise to the bill of costs herein. At all times, the firm of Mwamu & Company Advocates appeared for the respondents therein and who are the respondents in this application. There was no protest then that the firm had no instructions. The respondent cannot be allowed to dispute the retainer now. 5. Since the taxation, the bill has not been challenged in any way. I therefore dismiss the opposition to the application and allow the application. Orders to issue in terms of prayers ( a) to (c).

page 1 of 2

DELIVERED and SIGNED at HOMA BAY this 15th day of June, 2021 KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE JUDGE.

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.