Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 6141 of 2021

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KAKAMEGA SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 124 OF 1986 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF WEPUKHULU WANAMBISI MAUNDENDE (DECEASED) RULING 1. I delivered a judgment herein on 26th June, 2020, wherein I required the administrators to do several things, to assist me distribute the estate of the deceased herein. They were to file a further affidavit, detailing the names of the wives of the deceased, indicating whether the said wives were alive or dead; the names of the children of each of the wives, indicating whether the children were alive or dead, and whether the children are male or female, whether married or unmarried; and, lastly, where any of the children of the deceased were themselves dead, list all the children of such dead children of the deceased, who would be grandchildren of the deceased, indicating whether they were male or female. 2. The two administrators, David Wafula Wepukhulu and Moses Maundende Wephukulu, complied with the said orders of this court, by filing separate further affidavits, sworn 2 nd September 2020 and 18th September 2020, respectively, outlining the survivors of the deceased. The survivors are identified as listed below: 1st House i) Susan Nabalayo Wepukhulu widow deceased ii) Evanson Wafula Wepukhulu son deceased He is survived by:Christine Wafula Wepukhulu daughter-in-Law alive Everlyne Tawayi Wafula granddaughter alive Carolyne Wafula granddaughter alive Ceasor Wafula grandson alive Jesse Wafula grandson alive Brian Wafula grandson alive Abraham Wafula grandson alive Susan Wafula granddaughter alive Brenda Wafula granddaughter alive Angela Wafula granddaughter alive Lilian Wafula granddaughter deceased iii) Mary Nabwile

page 1 of 4

Survived by one daughter (deceased) Aggripina Nafuna Ochuna granddaughter iv) Wilberforce Mutambo Malotelo Son v) Risper Nasibwondi daughter alive alive deceased Survived by:Rose Nanjala granddaughter alive Beatrice Nasimiyu granddaughter alive Christine Naliali granddaughter alive Judith Nakitang’a granddaughter alive Musa Sifuna grandson alive vi) Teresina Nekesa Kachina daughter vii) Joseph Wanambisi Wepukhulu son alive alive 2nd House i) Brictor Nakhanu Wepukhulu widow alive ii) Emily Lumonya Wepukhulu daughter alive iii) Everline Ateya daughter alive iv) Wilkister Nanjala daughter deceased She is survived by:Tobia Simiyu grandson alive Amos Nyongesa grandson alive Kevin Barasa grandson alive Claudio Sikuku grandson alive Pamenous Simiyu grandson alive Emmanuel Simiyu grandson alive Tabitha Mukhwana granddaughter alive son alive daughter alive v) Albert Ngutuku Wepukhulu vi) Favour Muchuma vii) Amos Wanambisi Wepukhulu son deceased Survived by:Florina Nekesa Masinde daughter-in-law alive Ruth Nekesa granddaughter alive Bramwel Barasa grandson alive

page 2 of 4

Miriam Nafula granddaughter alive Purity Nerima granddaughter alive viii) David Wafula Wepukhulu son alive ix) Rose Nanjala Richard daughter alive 3rd House i) Beatrice Nanyama Wepukhulu widow alive ii) Moses Maundende Wepukhulu son alive iii) Fredrick Nyongesa Wepukhulu son alive iv) Francis Muindi Wepukhulu son alive v) Glanet Nakhumicha daughter deceased She is survived by:Evergast Wambeye grandson alive Masinde Khakula grandson alive Joseph Khakula grandson alive Elam Khakula grandson alive Junior Khakula granddaughter alive vi) Everlyne Nasimiyu Barasa daughter alive 3. The administrators have substantially complied with order relating to survivors of the deceased, save that they have not indicated the marital statuses of the survivors, although that may be of little consequence. 4. I had further directed that the administrators ensure that all persons beneficially entitled to the estate of the deceased sign a consent in Form 37, as required by Rule 40(8) of the Probate and Administration Rules, affirming the mode of distribution. A consent on distribution has been filed in court. It has been signed by Beatrice Nakhanu Wepukhulu, Christine Wafula Wepukhulu, Wilberforce Mutambo Malotelo, Joseph Wanambisi Wepukhulu, Moses Maundende Wepukhulu, Fredrick Nyongesa Wepukhulu, Francis Muindi Wepukhulu, Agglipina Nafuna Ochuma, Rose Nanjala, Evergast Wambeye, Everline Nasimiyu Barasa and Teresina Nekesa Kachila. The affidavits on the survivors of the deceased, as filed by the administrators, show 48 persons, as enumerated in paragraph 2, of this ruling. The consent is, however, signed by 12 persons. No affidavits have been placed on record by the remaining 36 survivors, to express their views on the distribution of the estate. Without the said affidavits, and in absence of consent by the 36, I shall take it that they opted leave the matter to the court, to distribute the estate strictly in accordance with the law. 5. The administrators were also directed to deliberate and give their final position on the alleged purchasers of some of the assets of the estate of the deceased. The alleged purchasers are Fred Wafula Ngichabe, Peter Khisa Wamukota, Bartholomew Juma Wafula, Eliud Makokha Bwile(Deceased), Wanambisi Stephen Juma, Benedict Wafula Kokonya, Amos Kunikina Marani, Petronila Khakasa Wati, Reuben Makokha Barasa, Mary Nelima Wanyama, George Makinda Nyongesa, Daniel Kweyu Maili, David Biketi Wati, Carolyne Naliaka Njalale/Allan Wafula Mabuka, Christine Naswa Sifuna, Fred Wamalwa Nyongesa, Concepta Naliaka Juma and Wickliffe Malaa Wakhungu. In his affidavit, David Wafula Wepukhulu offers no land to Fred Wafula Ngichabe, Peter Khisa Wamukota, Bartholomew Juma Wafula and Petronila Nafula, the wife of Elius Makokha Bwile. They agree to distribute to the rest of the purchasers. How the distribution will be made to these purchases, has, however, not been disclosed. 6. The court had also directed the administrators to state the law they would wish to apply in the distribution of the estate of the deceased. In his affidavit of David Wafula Wepukhulu, states that the deceased was from the Luhya community, Bukusu sub-tribe, and that he hailed from the Bakangala Clan. The administrator further indicates that they would wish for the customs of the Luhya Community, particularly the Bukusu sub-tribe to apply in the distribution of the deceased’s estate. I note though that the administrators have not addressed me on the substance of the Bukusu customs on intestate distribution. It would appear that they are leaving it to the court to ascertain the said customs. Customs are a matter of fact, and I cannot ascertain the same in the absence of evidence being adduced. In the absence of that, I shall revert to Part V of the Law of Succession Act. 7. With the above in mind, I shall proceed to dispose of the estate of the deceased, guided by section 40 of the Law of Succession Act. The deceased died a polygamist. His household comprises of three houses, and, therefore, I shall distribute his estate according to the three houses, by taking into account the number of children in that house, adding any surviving widow in each house as an additional unit. After

page 3 of 4

allocating each house its portion based on the number of children in each house, each house shall thereafter share out its entitlement in terms of sections 35 to 38 of the Law of Succession Act. 8. The widow in the 1st house died. She had 6 children. 3 of the 6 children are also deceased, but they were survived by children. The 1 st house, therefore, comprises of 6 units. The widow in the 2 nd house is alive, and she had 8 children, 2 of who are dead, but were survived by children. That would mean that the 2 nd house is comprised of 9 units. The widow in the 3 rd house is also alive. She had 5 children, 1 of whom is deceased, but is survived by a child. The 3 rd house, therefore, comprises of 6 units. The total units come to 21 units. The total estate, being East Bukusu/North Sang’alo/661, shall be divided into 21 units, which shall thereafter be shared out between the 3 houses, in the ratio of 6:9:6 or 2:3:2. 9. With regard to the purchasers, the position should be that the sales that were not upheld by the court in Kakamega HCCA No. 133 of 1989, remain invalid. It shall be up to the administrators to settle them, if they are inclined to, from the shares allocated to each of the houses, subject to consents from members of the houses. Where the purchasers bought land from the sons of the deceased, after the demise of the deceased, they should look up to the sons who sold the land to them. 10. The final orders, in the circumstances, are: (a) That the administrators are hereby confirmed to finalize distribution of the estate; (b) That East Bukusu/North Sang’alo/661 shall be shared out in the manner set out in paragraph 8 of this ruling; (c) That after the 1st house gets its share, the property shall thereafter be distributed amongst the children of the deceased equally, and where any of the children is dead, their children shall take their share and divided it equally amongst themselves; (d) That after the 2nd and 3rd houses get their share, the same shall devolve upon the surviving spouse in each house during life interest, and thereafter, should the life interest determine, to the children equally, and if any of the children are dead, then the share accruing to the dead child shall devolve upon their children equally; (e) That a certificate of confirmation of grant shall issue to the administrators in those terms; (f) That each party shall bear their own costs; and (g) That any party aggrieved by the orders made above, has leave of 28 days, to move the Court of Appeal, appropriately. DELIVERED, DATED AND SIGNED IN OPEN COURT AT KAKAMEGA THIS 18th DAY OF June 2021 W. MUSYOKA JUDGE

page 4 of 4

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.