Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Daneva Heavy Trucks & 1 other v Chrispine Otieno

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CIVIL APPEAL NO. E007 OF 2021 CORAM: HON. R.E. ABURILI, J DANEVA HEAVY TRUCKS............................................................................1 ST APPELLANT RASHID K. MUGONZA..................................................................................2 ND APPELLANT VERSUS CHRISPINE OTIENO...........................................................................................RESPONDENT (An Appeal arising from Judgment and Order in Ukwala PM’s Court Civil Suit No. 28 of 2019 delivered on 10.03.2021 by Hon. C.N. Sindani, Principal Magistrate) RULING 1. The applicants Daneva Heavy Trucks and Rashid K.Mugonza seek leave of court to file an appeal out of time from the judgment and decree in Ukwala PMCC 28/2019 delivered on 10/3/2021. 2. The delay in filing the intended appeal has been explained that the advocates received instructions from the clients late. 3. That is no good reason for the delay as the case does not belong to the advocate. However as the delay is not too inordinate and justice can still be served despite the delay of a few days, and as the application is not opposed by the Respondents, I hereby allow the application dated 14/4/2021 and grant the prayers sought, extending time for filing of an appeal out of time by ten days from the date hereof. 4. The Respondent shall have costs of this application assessed at Kshs. 6,000/= to be paid within the next 14 days of today in default he is at liberty to execute for recovery. This file is closed. 5. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2021 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.