Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Fredrick Mutuku Ngemu v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE 256 OF 2019 FREDRICK MUTUKU NGEMU....................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC................................................RESPONDENT RULING The applicant, FREDRICK MUTUKU NGEMU has filed a Notice of Motion Application herein on 7.10.2019. the application, based on section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, seeks review of his sentence. The application does not disclose much information, but seeks that the period spent in remand be factored in the sentence. He stated that he was arrested on 5.7.2015 and was convicted on 8.2.2019, and was never on bond. The prosecution has opposed this application. That he was arrested on 15.7.2015 and charged on 20.7.2015 and later sentenced to serve 10 years’ imprisonment on 8.2.2019. That the penalty provided for in law is not less that 20 years, and that the trial court duly took into account the time spent in custody. Counsel prayed that this application be dismissed. I have considered the submissions of the applicant and also the response from the Respondent. I have also carefully considered the proceedings of the lower court with specific focus on the sentencing proceedings of 8.2.2019. Section 333(2) at the proviso dictates that the period the accused has spent in remand custody white awaiting trial out to be accounted for in the sentence. The applicant faced a charge of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006. Under this section, the sentence to be meted out is a term of not less than 20 years imprisonment. The applicant herein was sentenced to serve 10 years imprisonment. The sentence proceedings also clearly show that the trial magistrate duly considered the mitigation of the applicant and also the period he has spent in custody pending conclusion of his trial. I am therefore convinced that the trial magistrate in sentencing the applicant, duly satisfied the provisions of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This application of the applicant filed in this court on 7.10.2019 lacks any merit. I accordingly dismiss the same. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 26.7.2021. Court: Read out in presence of the applicant (Kitengela Prison), and Mr. Kiragu, counsel for the state. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 26.7.2021.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.

Fredrick Mutuku Ngemu v Republic — Original judgment | Caselaw