Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Prosecutor v Austine Otieno Muda & 1 other

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU HCCRC NO. 10 OF 2019 PROSECUTOR ….…………………………………………..….. REPUBLIC VERSUS AUSTINE OTIENO MUDA …………………………….………. ACCUSED NOTES ON SENTENCING The accused, AUSTINE OTIENO MUDA, was convicted for the offence of Manslaughter, contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code. 1. He was convicted upon his own plea of “guilty”. 2. The accused has prayed for leniency. He said that he was very remorseful for what had happened. 3. In his mitigation he prayed for a non-custodial sentence. 4. The prosecution submitted that the accused had not shown any remorse. The reason for that contention was that, although the accused was a relative of the deceased, he never reached out to the relatives of the deceased. 5. I have taken into account the fact that the accused hit the deceased on the head, using a metal rod. The post-mortem report shows that the deceased sustained a penetrating skull injury with a circumscribed fracture of the vertex of the head. 6. The deceased was a Village Elder, and he was trying to protect a lady from the accused. 7. The accused wanted to marry the lady, but the lady was resistant. 8. The accused became angry with the deceased when the latter tried to protect the lady. 9. I have taken into account the mitigation, noting that the accused has been in custody for more than 2 years. 10. In the Plea Agreement dated 27 th April 2021, the prosecution had notified the accused that the issue of sentencing was within the sole discretion of the trial Judge, 11. Secondly, the prosecution had indicated that they would ask the Court to hand down a sentence of 15 Years Imprisonment. 12. On the other hand, the accused had indicated, (in the Plea Agreement) that he would ask the Court to sentence him to 3 Years Imprisonment. 13. It was thus curious that notwithstanding the express statements contained in the Plea Agreement the accused asked for a non-custodial sentence. 14. Having taken into account the circumstances in which the offence was committed, the mitigation and the fact that the accused pleaded guilty, I now sentence him to TEN (10) Years Imprisonment. 15. For the avoidance of any doubt, and in compliance with Section 333 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I direct that in computing the

page 1 of 2

duration of the sentence herein, the accused shall be given credit for the period which he spent in custody, during the trial. DATED, SIGNED and DELIVERED at KISUMU This 21st day of July 2021 FRED A. OCHIENG JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.