REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL CASE NO. 36 OF 2016 REPUBLIC.................................................................................................PROSECUTION VERSUS SILAS MUKIRA...........................................................................................1 ST ACCUSED STANLEY THIAINE...................................................................................2 ND ACCUSED RULING ON CASE TO ANSWER 1. The accused persons were jointly charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The prosecution’s case is that on 24 th June 2016, at about 22.00 hours, the deceased and his wife Esther Makena were in the kitchen when they were attacked by a group of four people two of whom are the accused persons and the deceased was killed. Both accused persons pleaded not guilty to the charge and the matter proceeded to trial, the prosecution calling 5 witnesses to prove the charge. 2. The court has considered as required under section 306 of the Criminal Procedure Code whether there is the evidence that the accused persons or any of the accused persons committed the offence. At this stage, however, the court is required to be satisfied only that a prima facie case exists as held in Ramanlal T. Bhatt v. R (1957) EA 332, 335 ta prima facie case is “one on which a reasonable tribunal properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence could convict if no explanation is offered by the defence.” 3. Upon considering the evidence presented herein by the Prosecution, without exhaustive discussion of the merits so as not to prejudice the fair trial of the case as counseled by Kibera Karimi v. R (1979) KLR 36, and Festo Wandera Mukando v. R (1976 – 80) KLR 1626, the court find that the Prosecution has established a prima facie case against the two accused persons. 4. Consequently, the accused shall be put on their defence in accordance with section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, and their rights thereunder shall be explained to them. Order accordingly. DATED AND DELIVERED THIS 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2021. EDWARD M. MURIITHI JUDGE Appearances MS B. Nandwa Prosecution Counsel for the State Mr. Atheru Advocate for the accused persons.
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.