Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 3444 of 2021

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARSEN CRIMINAL CASE NO. 6 OF 2019 REPUBLIC ................................................................PROSECUTOR VERSUS ZUHURA HAMADAWA KOMORA..............................ACCUSED Coram: Hon. Justice R. Nyakundi Mr. Mwangi for the state The accused person S E N T E N C I N G V E R D I C T This was a conviction of Manslaughter contrary to Section 202 of the Penal Code arising out of a plea-bargaining agreement between the state and the convict. I have carefully considered the mitigation, and aggravating factors which contribute to the score sheet of punishment to be imposed. The maximum sentence for the offence is prescribed as life imprisonment. However, the evidence from the probation and after care services on the pre-sentence report shows a victim offender paradigm took place incorporating various elements towards restorative justice for the victim family and the convict. There is no empirical evidence that the convict would pause a risk to society. I therefore see no reason why the convict should not benefit by receiving a non-custodial sentence. While sentencing the convict, its worthy to take notice that she is currently at an advanced stage of her pregnancy to give birth to the second child to her marriage. That to me under the paramount principle of the best interest of the child constitutes substantial and compelling circumstances to place the convict under the three (3) year period non-custodial sentence to be supervised by the Probation Officer. It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT MALINDI THIS 30TH DAY OF JULY 2021 ............................. R. NYAKUNDI JUDGE IN THE PRESENCE OF 1. MR. MWANGI FOR THE STATE 2. THE ACCUSED PERSON

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.