REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KITALE MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 34 (E155) OF 2021 GEOFREY ETHINYEN OKELO............................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.............................................................................RESPONDENT RULING The Applicant, Geofrey Ethinyen Okelo, was convicted of the offence of Burglary and Stealing contrary to Section 304 as read with Section 279 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve five (5) years imprisonment on 15 th May 2019. This was in Kitale CMCCRC No. 3110/2019. The Applicant has been in prison serving the custodial sentence since then. He has now filed an application before this court seeking revision of his custodial sentence. In his application, the Applicant stated that at the time of his arrest, he was a secondary school student. During the period of his incarceration, he had learnt his lesson. He had undertaken several courses that have made him a better person. He has learnt a trade that will serve him upon his release should the court favourably, consider his application. The Applicant stated that he was twenty one years of age and should in the circumstances be given a second chance at life. Mr Omooria for the State left the issue of sentence to the court. In sentencing the Applicant to serve the custodial sentence, the trial magistrate was exercising judicial discretion. This court cannot interfere with such exercise of judicial discretion unless it is established that the trial court failed to take into consideration a relevant factor or took into consideration an irrelevant factor or failed to consider the applicable sentencing Principles. This court will interfere with such sentence, if it is established that the same was harsh or excessive in the circumstance. In the present application, this court cannot fault the trial magistrate for reaching the verdict that was reached. It was legal. It took into account the severity of the offence that was committed. However, this court noted that since his incarceration, the Applicant has reformed. He is remorseful and regrets the decision that led him to commit the offence. He has learnt his lesson. It appears that the period of two years that the Applicant has been in prison, he has learnt that crime does not pay. This court is of the view that the Applicant should be given a second chance at life. In the premises therefore, the custodial sentence of the Applicant is commuted to the period served. The Applicant is ordered set at liberty forthwith and released from prison unless otherwise lawfully held. DATED AT KITALE THIS 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021. L. KIMARU JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.