Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 2841 of 2021

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAROK CRIMINAL CASE NO. 39 OF 2017 (CORAM: F.M. GIKONYO J.) REPUBLIC -versusISAACK KAGIRI WANJIKU RULING Prima facie case [1] The accused herein is charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read Section 204 of the Penal Code. It is alleged that on 8th November 2017 at Oloikirkirai Trading Centre in Narok North Sub-county within Narok County he murdered one Evaline Rehak. [2] The prosecution called nine (9) witnesses in support of their case. The court is now called upon to determine whether or not the prosecution has made out a prima facie case against the accused that would warrant this court to call upon the accused to give his defence. [3] As it was stated in the English Case of May vs. O’Sullivan [1955] 92 CLR 654 : “When at the close of the case for the prosecution a submission is made that there is no case to answer, the question to be decided is not whether on the evidence as it stands the defendant ought to be convicted, but whether on the evidence as it stands he could lawfully be convicted. This is really a question of law.” [4] The threshold therefore, of a Prima facie case is; ‘’…one which a reasonable tribunal properly directing its mind to the law and the evidence would convict if no explanation is offered by the defence’’. See RAMANLAL BHATT vs. R (1957) EA 332(CA) [5] Without making any definite findings, careful consideration of the evidence adduced- circumstantial and medical- reveals a prima facie case against the accused person, Accordingly, I place the accused to his defence. [6] The accused is duly informed of his right to address the court, either personally or by his advocate, to give evidence on his own behalf, or to make an unsworn statement, and to call witnesses in his defence. The accused person or his advocate shall now state whether it is intended to call any witnesses as to fact other than the accused person himself. [7] It is so ordered. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT NAROK THROUGH MICROSOFT TEAMS ONLINE APPLICATION THIS 21ST DAY OF OCTOBER, 2021 ............................ F. GIKONYO M. JUDGE

page 1 of 2

In the presence of: 1. Karanja for DPP 2. Langat for accused 3. Accused present 4. Mr. Kasaso – CA ............................ F. GIKONYO M. JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.