Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Hadija Nanjala Chemiati v Jamin Wasike Chemiati

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT BUNGOMA CIVIL SUIT NO. 91 OF 2005 (O.S) HADIJA NANJALA CHEMIATI...........................................................PLAINTIFF VERSUS JAMIN WASIKE CHEMIATI............................................................DEFENDANT AND RAMADHAN MUSUMBA CHEMIATI..............................................APPLICANT AND GAYANI ENTERPRISES....................................................INTERESTED PARTY RULING The interested party in an application dated 24th November, 2020 seeks the following orders;1. That an order do issue directing that all the tenants on land parcel number Bungoma/Township/228 to deposit monthly rent in court pending the hearing and determination of this suit and other suits pending before the honouranle court touching on the suit parcels. 2. Costs. The application is supported by the affidavit of Sarah Hersi Ali, one of the directors of the interested party. She depones that the suit parcel of land is registered in the interested party’s name and has several business with tenants who pay rent directly to the plaintiff which fact she depones is prejudicial to the interested party. The applicant, Ramdhan Musumba Chemiati in response to the application filed a notice of preliminary objection dated 10/5/2021 raising the following grounds; 1. That the honourable court lacks the necessary jurisdiction to entertain the application. 2. That the application is an abuse of the court process. The parties by consent agreed to dispose of the preliminary objection by way of written submissions. Both parties filed their submissions and the court reserved the ruling for 27/7/2021. By way of letter dated 7/6/2021, the interested party’s counsel expressed his intention to withdraw the application subject of the ruling. The request to withdraw is hereby allowed. The interested party’s application dated 24/11/2020 is hereby dismissed. Each party to bear its own costs to the application. DATED AT BUNGOMA THIS 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 S. N. RIECHI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.