Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Charles Otieno Ochieng v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E104 OF 2021 CORAM: R.E. ABURILI, J CHARLES OTIENO OCHIENG.....APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC....................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the application filed on 2/11/2021. I find the same not signed by the applicant. There is further no substance in the ‘application’ as there is no demonstration of pauperism and why the appellant never filed his appeal in time. 2. The Applicant does not state when his case was rejected under Section 352(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code as he has not even stated the case number for the lower court file if any was filed. 3. The Application is bare and devoid of any material and substance to support it to warrant grant of the orders sought. The application is hereby dismissed. 4. File closed. 5. Applicant to be notified through Prisons email used to send the ‘application.’ DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2021 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.