Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Violet Akinyi Onjiko v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. E256 OF 2021 VIOLET AKINYI ONJIKO............................................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...................................................................................................RESPONDENT RULING The applicant, VIOLENT AKINYI ONJIKO, has filed this application on 23.7.2021 under certificate of urgency. The same, is seeking orders under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Order. That the period of 1½ years that she spent in custody awaiting determination of her trial be accounted for in her sentence. The prosecution has however opposed this application on grounds that the said sentence was proper and with the law. It was however, conceded that the court may consider the period spent in custody if the trial court failed to do so. It is clear that the applicant faced charges under section 8(1) as read with Section 8(2) and section 11(1) of the Sexual Offences Act, No. 3 of 2006. I have considered the record of the proceedings herein. It is clear from the same that when the applicant was given the opportunity to mitigate, she only raised the issue of time she had spent in custody for consideration. The court, in sentencing the applicant, on 27.9.2019, stated (at paragraph 12), that; “The accused person is therefore sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment less 3 years she has been in custody. She will therefore serve 7 years’ imprisonment.” From the sentence proceedings, the court clearly considered the mitigation of the accused, and also a probation officers report. The sentence passed is no doubt legal and proper. With the court clearly noting mitigation of the applicant, and giving accounts of the period spent in custody, this application clearly lacks merit. The same is dismissed wholly. Orders accordingly. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 18.11.2021. Court: RULING READ OUT IN OPEN COURT IN PRESENCE OF THE APPLICANT (LANGATA) AND MS. AKUNJA FOR THE STATE. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 18.11.2021.

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.