Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Alex Mungi Mbugua v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CRIMINAL REVISION 150 OF 2019 ALEX MUNGI MBUGUA ……..……….……….………………APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC …………………………………………….……. RESPONDENT RULING The applicant herein, ALEX MURIGI MBUGUA, has vide an application dated 23.5.2019 pleaded with this court for revision of the sentence passed on him in Makadara Chief magistrate’s court, Cr. Case Number 1605 of 2017. The applicant seeks that the period he spent in custody pending determination of his trial bee accounted for in the sentence. This application is basically hinged on section 333(2) of the criminal procedure code. the said section states at its proviso; “Provided that where the person sentenced under sub-section (1) has prior to such sentence, been held in custody, the sentence shall take account of the period spent in custody.” I have considered the proceedings herein. The applicant was first arraigned in court on 25.7.2017. Though he was granted bail (on terms), he remained in custody till the late of sentence on 10.8.2018. This was a period of 1 year. I have also considered the sentencing proceedings of the lower court. It is clear that the trial court considered the relevant provisions of the law on both charges, the mitigation that the applicant made, and also a report of the probation officer. In his mitigation, however, he never raised the issue of period he had spent in custody. The Honourable trial magistrate did not note that in the sentence the period spent in custody had been accounted for. The court ought to have accounted for the same as provided for in the law above. It is for this reason that I find merit in the application of the applicant dated 23.5.2019. I allow the same and order that the applicant do serve his imprisonment term(s) as ordered by the trial court less the period of 1 year that he spent in custody awaiting determination of his case. Orders accordingly. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 17.11.2021. Court: Ruling read out in court (on-line) no presence of the applicant (Nairobi West) and Ms. Ndombi for state. D. O. OGEMBO JUDGE 17.11.2021.

page 1 of 2

FROM: HIGH COURT APPELLATE SIDE 18TH NOVEMBER 2021 HCCRREV. NO. 150 OF 2019 HIGH COURT CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 150 OF 2019 ORIGINATING FROM THE CHIEF MAGISTRATE’S COURT AT MAKADARA CRIMINAL CASE NO. 1605 OF 2017. APPELLANT ALEX MUNGI MBUGUA (NWP/1259/018/LS) APPLICANT DO SERVE HIS IMPRISONMENT TERM(S) AS ORDERED BY THE TRIAL COURT LESS THE PERIOD OF 1 YEAR THAT HE SPENT IN CUSTODY AWAITING DETERMINATION OF HIS CASE. DEPUTY REGISTRAR

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.