REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU (CORAM: CHERERE-J) CRIMINAL CASE NO. 57 OF 2018 BETWEEN REPUBLIC...............................................................................................PROSECUTOR AND PAUL MWENDA KIMANI...........................................................................ACCUSED RULING 1. PAUL MWENDA KIMANI (Accused) is charged with the offence of Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge are that on the night of 22 nd and 23rd June, 2018, at Maua location, in Igembe South sub-county within Meru County murdered WINFRED KAARI. 2. The accused person denied committing the offence and the prosecution called a total of 3 (Three) witnesses in support of their case. Upon the prosecution closing its case this court has to determine whether or not the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused as defined in the case Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt vs Rex [1957] EA 332, 335. 3. At this stage, the court is not required to decide finally whether the evidence is worthy of credit or whether, if believed, it is weighty enough to prove the case conclusively, -that final determination can only properly be made when the case for the defence has been heard. 4. Having considered the evidence tendered by the four prosecution witnesses I am persuaded that a prima facie case has been established that warrants this court to call upon the Accused person to defend himself. 5. Accordingly, the Accused person will proceed as provided under Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. DATED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER ,2021 WAMAE. T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Court Assistant - Kinoti Accused - Present For the Accused persons - Mr. Mutegi Advocate For the State - Ms. Mwaniki
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.