Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Prosecutor v Samwel Onyango Otieno

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU HCCRC NO. 9 OF 2019 PROSECUTOR...................................................................................................REPUBLIC VERSUS SAMWEL ONYANGO OTIENO.........................................................................ACCUSED RULING The accused, SAMWEL ONYANGO OTIENO, was charged with the offence of Murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. 1. He pleaded “Not Guilty” to the charge. 2. The Prosecution has called 7 witnesses. 3. The evidence shows that the victim, ELSA ALUOCH, is dead. The doctor who performed the post-mortem examination on the body of the victim, formed the professional opinion that the cause of death was Haemorrhagic Shock from penetrative (stab) wounds due to assault by a sharp object. 4. The prosecution has shown, on a prima facie basis, that the last person to be seen with the victim on the night before her body was recovered in Sondu Miriu River, was the accused. 5. At the time when the Accused was last seen, he was carrying the deceased on his shoulders, heading towards his home. 6. In the circumstance, I find that unless the Accused tenders evidence which might explain what transpired, there is a possibility that he might be held culpable for the offence. 7. Therefore, I find that the Accused has a case to answer. 8. He is informed that he is not obliged to say anything. If he chooses to remain silent, the Court would proceed to consider the evidence on record, and make a determination, after giving the prosecution and the accused an opportunity for submissions. 9. The Accused was further informed that he was entitled to choose to give either unsworn evidence or sworn evidence. 10. Should he give sworn evidence, the Accused would be cross-examined by the Prosecution. 11. Finally, the Accused was informed that he has the right to call witnesses, who would support his case. The said witnesses would be cross-examined by the prosecution, after each of them will have given his or her evidence-in-chief. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 23RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 FRED A. OCHIENG JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.