Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v Agnes Murochia Kamunya & 6 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU (CORAM: CHERERE-J) CRIMINAL CASE NO.1 OF 2017 BETWEEN REPUBLIC ..................................................................................................PROSECUTOR AND AGNES MUROCHIA KAMUNYA ............................................................1 ST ACCUSED PATRICK KINOTI KAMUNYA ...............................................................2 ND ACCUSED JEREMIAH KAILIKIA KAMUNYA ........................................................3 RD ACCUSED PHINEAS KINYUA KAOME....................................................................4 TH ACCUSED DAVID KINYUA MUGAMBI......................................................................5 TH ACCUSED MARY KANARIO KAMUNYA ................................................................6 TH ACCUSED DOMICIANO KOBIA KITIBO.................................................................7 TH ACCUSED RULING 1. Accused persons herein are jointly charged with the offence of Murder Contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge are that on the night of 24 th and 25th December, 2016 at Kianjai Market, Kianjai Location, in Tigania West Sub-County within Meru County murdered LEONARD MWITI MUGAMBI alias Mbotela. 2. The accused person denied committing the offence and the prosecution called a total of 9 (nine) witnesses in support of their case. Upon the prosecution closing its case this court has to determine whether or not the prosecution has established a prima facie case against the accused as defined in the case Ramanlal Trambaklal Bhatt vs Rex [1957] EA 332, 335. 3. At this stage, the court is not required to decide finally whether the evidence is worthy of credit or whether, if believed, it is weighty enough to prove the case conclusively, -that final determination can only properly be made when the case for the defence has been heard. 4. Having considered the evidence tendered by the nine prosecution witnesses I am persuaded that a prima facie case has been established that warrants this court to call upon the Accused persons to defend himself. 5. Accordingly, the Accused person will proceed as provided under Section 306 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. DATED THIS 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021 WAMAE. T. W. CHERERE JUDGE COURT ASSISTANT - KINOTI

page 1 of 2

ACCUSED 1-7 - PRESENT FOR THE ACCUSED PERSONS - MR. KAIMENYI ADVOCATE FOR THE STATE - MS. MWANIKI

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.