Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 1371 of 2021

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT ELDORET CRIMINAL CASE NO. 66 OF 2015 MARY KIMOI..................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC...................................RESPONDENT RULING ON BAIL/BOND 1. On 20.1.2016, the accused person herein MARY KIMOI applied for bail/bond which the court declined to grant mainly on the ground that the safety of the accused could not be guaranteed if the accused was to be released on bail. 2. Many years down the line, it appears that circumstances have changed on the ground, and the accused’s brother-in-law, AMOS KOMEN KENDAGOR has sworn an affidavit on 22.10.2021 stating that the accused would be received well at home. 3. The accused is a mother of 10 children and is charged with murder of her husband. 4. The accused is entitled to bond or bail. In the circumstances, all the court needs is to establish what terms to impose on bond. The prosecution did not oppose bail but submitted for a sum Shs.150,000 cash bail, or Shs.250,000 bond with one surety of similar amount. 5. The accused has been in remand for over 6 years now. She has young children who need her care. I am satisfied that the accused should be released on an affordable bond terms to take care of her children even as she attends court for hearing of her case. 6. In the upshot, I grant application for bond/bail in the following terms: (i) The accused is hereby released on cash bail of Kshs.60,000, or alternatively; (ii) The accused is released on a bond of Kshs.150,000 with a surety of similar amount. SIGNED AND DATED IN ELDORET THIS 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021. E. K. OGOLA JUDGE DATED AND DELIVERED IN ELDORET THIS 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021. R. NYAKUNDI JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.