Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Eliud Njuguna Mungai & 1 other v Patrick Gatitu Mutahi

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI CIVIL APPEAL NO. E662 OF 2021 ELIUD NJUGUNA MUNGAI.........................................................1 ST APPLICANT JOSEPH KIHIU MBURU...............................................................2 ND APPLICANT VERSUS PATRICK GATITU MUTAHI..........................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. The parties herein agreed on 17.11.2021 that stay execution pending appeal be granted but asked the court to determine the matter of security, based on their submissions. They have now filed submissions which this court has considered. While the Applicants offer a bank guarantee, the Respondent proposes that 2/3 of the decretal sum of Sh. 184,643/- be paid upfront to him and the balance be deposited into a joint fixed deposit account. 2. The court has considered the applicable principles as enunciated in Kenya Shell V Kibiru & Another (1986) KLR 410 and Nduhiu Gitahi & Another v Anna Wambui Warugongo (1988) 2 KLR 100, and the decree in the lower court. The decretal sums are modest and in balancing the interests of the parties, the court directs that the conditions for stay of execution pending appeal will be that the Applicants deposits the entire decretal sum into an interest earning account in the joint names of the parties’ advocates within 45 days of today’s date. Parties are at liberty to apply. DELIVERED AND SIGNED ELECTRONICALLY ON THIS 14TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2021 C. MEOLI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr Nyabuto for the Applicants Respondent: N/A C/A: Carol

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.