REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA MISC. CIVIL CASE NO. 62 OF 2021 (ORIGINATING FROM KISUMU MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 55/2019) ALICE NYOMENDA (OERI & CO. ADVOCATES)..................................APPLICANT VERSUS SILVANUS OSOBO ONYIEGO.................................................................RESPONDENT RULING 1. I have considered the aspplication seeking leave to be heard during the recess. I grant leave to be heard during the recess. On the main application for stay, I am not satisfied that any urgency is disclosed. I decline to certify it as urgent for reasons that the orders which are sought to be stayed are in execution of a decree which matter was settled by a consent order of 13 th November 2021 and there is no order varying the said consent. 2. I direct the Applicant to serve the Respondent with the application for consideration by the trial court in the ordinary course of business in the next term and may, in the intervening period approach the Respondent for an amicable settlement. 3. The file is returned to Kisumu High Court for further directions in the new term, a date to be given by the Deputy Registrar, Kisumu. 4. Orders accordingly. DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 23RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 R.E. ABURILI JUDGE
Original judgment
Alice Nyomenda (oeri & Co. Advocates) v Silvanus Osobo Onyiego
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.