Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

1. Pius Machina Racho 2. John Mwaura Racho 3. Catherine Wanjiru Racho 4. Ruth Nyambura Racho 5. Lydia Ngina Thiong’o 6. Mary Wanjiku Racho v Moses Mureithi Racho

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KIAMBU SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 94 OF 2018 IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF HARUN RACHO KATHETHA Alias RACHO KATHETHA HARUN Alias RACHO KATHETHA HARUN Alias RACHO KATHETHA (DECEASED) 1. PIUS MACHINA RACHO 2. JOHN MWAURA RACHO 3. CATHERINE WANJIRU RACHO 4. RUTH NYAMBURA RACHO 5. LYDIA NGINA THIONG’O 6. MARY WANJIKU RACHO.........OBJECTORS/APPLICANTS VERSUS MOSES MUREITHI RACHO.....PETITIIONER/RESPONDENT RULING 1. MOSES MUREITHI RACHO petitioned for grant of probate of written Will in this cause and the grant was issued dated 12 th February, 2019. 2. Before court are two applications. One is dated 11 th September, 2019 for confirmation of the grant. The other is dated 24 th September, 2019 which seeks revocation of the grant. 3. The court on 27th November, 2019 ordered both applications be heard by affidavit evidence and by submissions. On receiving those affidavits and written submissions, I gave today’s date for Ruling. I have however formed the opinion that a substantive ruling cannot be issued in the absence of this Court receiving viva voce evidence. This is because the application for revocation of grant is sought on the ground that the written Will presented in this cause is forgery and that accordingly, the grant obtained was fraudulent. In this Court’s view, such allegation cannot be determined on affidavit evidence. It is essential for the court to receive vivo voce evidence. 4. In view of the above at the reading of this Ruling, a date for receiving the viva voce evidence will be fixed. 5. Orders accordingly. RULING DATED AND DELIVERED AT KIAMBU THIS 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER, 2021 MARY KASANGO JUDGE Coram: Court Assistant: Maurice

page 1 of 2

For Objectors : Ms. Namisi For Petitioner : Mr. Gitau COURT Ruling delivered virtually. MARY KASANGO JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.