Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Lhc v Director of Public Prosecutions

LHC v Director of Public Prosecutions (Constitutional Petition 151 of 2019) [2021] KEHC 293 (KLR) (15 November 2021) (Judgment) Neutral citation: [2021] KEHC 293 (KLR) REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT AT MOMBASA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION 151 OF 2019 JM MATIVO, J NOVEMBER 15, 2021 BETWEEN LHC ........................................................................................................... PETITIONER AND DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS .................................... RESPONDENT JUDGMENT 1. The Petitioner is said to have been of unsound mind at the time of the commission of the ofience. Upon being convicted he was sentenced to serve under president’s pleasure. For starters, indeterminate sentences have been held to be unconstitutional in several cases in the country. Such that if this sentence was being meted today, I doubt whether the court could have imposed an indeterminate sentence. 2. The Petitioner is said to have been in prison for 20 years (5 years in custody pending trial and 15 years in prison). The Re-sentencing report/socio-inquiry reports are favourable. The prosecution is not opposed to the court Re-sentencing the Petitioner. Taking into account the peculiar circumstances of this case and the said reports and period the Petitioner has been incarcerated, I reduce the sentence imposed upon the Petitioner to the period served in jail. I order that he (the Petitioner Mr. LHC) be released forthwith unless otherwise lawfully held. DATED, DATED AND DELIVERED IN MOMBASA VIRTUALLY THIS 15TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021. JOHN M. MATIVO JUDGE https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2021/293/eng@2021-11-15 1

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.