Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

kehc-2020-09764

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI FAMILY AND PROBATE DIVISION ADOPTION CAUSE NO. 39 OF 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT (ACT NO. 8 OF 2001) AND IN THE MATTER OF ADOPTION OF BABY IP (MINOR) BY GNM & RGN (APPLICANTS) JUDGMENT Background: 1. Before court is an application for adoption of a child referred to as Baby IP, by way of an Originating Summons dated the 17 th of February, 2017, as amended on the 20th of May, 2018, and brought pursuant to Sections 154 & 158 of the Children’s Act. 2. The Applicants seek for orders that; they be allowed to adopt the minor and upon such adoption the child be known as JMN; for WNM & PWM to be appointed as legal guardians of the child in the event the applicants are incapacitated or are no more and the child still unable to fend for himself; for the Registrar General to make appropriate entries in the Adoption Register; and the child’s birth date be deemed as 31 st January 2013. 3. On the 22nd of June, 2017 the court appointed JWW as guardian ad litem, and directed both the Director of Children’s Services Department in Nairobi and the said guardian ad litem to investigate the Applicants’ fitness to adopt and file their respective reports. 4. The Director of Department of Children’ Services report is dated 4 th September, 2017, though filed in court on the 12th of February, 2018. The report gives the ages of the two applicants as 46 and 48 years respectively. They are both self-employed and have a decent income. They were customarily married in 1994 and solemnised their marriage before the registrar of marriages on 6 th May, 2014. The applicants do not have any biological child of their own, hence this adoption. 5. It was reported that the child was found abandoned in Majengo Township of Kajiado County on the 31 st of January, 2013. A good Samaritan reported the incident at the Kajiado Police Station, under OB NO. [….] whereupon the child was placed at Mahali Pa Maisha Children’s Home. Later the court committed the child to the said home and he was declared free for adoption by Buckner Kenya on the 18 th January 2014. 6. The child was placed with the Applicants on the 14 th of March, 2014 under Certificate Number [….]. The investigative report highly recommended the adoption. 7. The Guardian ad litem filed a report on 7th March, 2018. The guardian attends the same church with the applicants and is a master guide for the youth in the said church. He visited the home twice and was able to observe the child and the applicants. He formed the opinion that the child is happy and well taken care of by the adoptive parents. He is of the view that the adoption would be in the best interest of the child. 8. The Applicants have met all the necessary legal requirements for an adoption order to issue and based on the reports referred above,

page 1 of 2

certainly it will be in the best interest of the child to have the Applicants as his parents. 9. Consequently, a. GNM & RGN be and are hereby authorised to adopt BABY IP who will hence forth be known as JMN. b. The minor’s date of birth be deemed to be the 31st of January 2013. c. The Registrar General do register the adoption and issue a certificate. d. WNM & PWM be and are hereby appointed as the Legal Guardians to JMN e. The guardian ad litem JWW is hereby discharge from the obligation earlier bestowed upon him by the court. SIGNED DATED and DELIVERED this 27th day of May, 2020. ALI-ARONI JUDGE

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.