Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Republic v [First Accused] and [Second Accused]

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU CRIMINAL DIVISION HIGH COURT CRIMINAL CASE NO 82 OF 2015 REPUBLIC........................................................ DPP VERSUS 1. ROSE THIRIKWA IKIAO 2. STANLEY KARUTI MERIMBA ......ACCUSED RULING 1. After careful consideration of the evidence, I am satisfied that the prosecution has establish a Prima Facie case against the first accused. She is accordingly put on her defence. Section 211 of the C.P.C complied with. 2. As regards the 2nd accused, I find that the prosecution has not established any Prima facie case. The reasons to be in the final judgment. He is accordingly acquitted under Section 210 of the CPC. A. MABEYA JUDGE 16/1/2020

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.