Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Michael Oduor Oronde v Republic

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 35 OF 2019 MICHAEL ODUOR ORONDE.........PETITIONER VERSUS REPUBLIC...................................... RESPONDENT (Petition for resentencing following mandatory death sentence imposed in Siaya PM Cr Case No 69 of 2008; affirmed by the High Court at Kisumu in HCRA NO. 177 of 2010 and the Court of Appeal at Kisumu in CA CRA 187 of 2012) JUDGMENT 1. The petitioner MICHAEL ODUOR ORONDE by this petition dated 22nd July 2019 seeks for resentencing following his conviction and sentence of death imposed on him for the offence of Robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code vide Siaya PM Cr Case No 69 of 2008; affirmed by the High Court at Kisumu in HCRA NO. 177 of 2010 and the Court of Appeal at Kisumu in CA CRA 187 of 2012 which appeals were all dismissed. 2. He seeks to benefit from the decision in Francis Muruatetu v Republic SC PETITION NO. 15/2015 decision that declared the mandatoriness of death sentence unconstitutional for depriving the convict an opportunity to mitigate and for depriving the trial court of the judicial discretion in sentencing. 3. I have considered the petition herein and the mitigations by the petitioner and his submissions. The petitioner has been in prison from 2008 and despite maintaining his innocence, he now readily admits having committed the offence. He seeks for leniency of this court. The items of the robbery were among others, blankets. He has been behind bars for close to 12 years and he says that he has not benefitted from the crime. He regrets the offence. He has trained in carpentry and biblical studies. He promises not to reoffend. 4. The Prosecution agrees that the petitioner has demonstrated remorse and that he can be a good ambassador to others out there. 5. Having considered the petition, mitigation and submissions by the prosecution, and circumstances under which the offence was committed, iam satisfied that the petitioner is remorseful and that he is reformed. He has learnt life’s skills in prison which can help him live a meaningful life in the society as he has learnt that crime does not pay. 6. In the premises, I hereby allow the petition for resentencing. I set aside the mandatory death sentence imposed on him and substitute it with a prison term of twenty (20) years to be calculated from 21/8/2008 7. Orders accordingly. Dated, Signed and Delivered at Siaya this 21st Day of January, 2020 R. E. ABURILI JUDGE In the presence of: The Petitioner in person Mr. Okachi SPPC for Respondent CA: Brenda and Modestar

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.