Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

High Court 8445 of 2020

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT KISUMU CIVIL CASE NO. 19 OF 2019 BETWEEN PATRICK LIHANDA.................................................................PLAINTIFF AND ANTONY KENYAKISA...................................................1 ST DEFENDANT ALBERT ASIGO..............................................................2 ND DEFENDANT PETER INWANI...............................................................3 RD DEFENDANT JOHN OLEMPROKOI.....................................................4 TH DEFENDANT FRED UMUHANO...........................................................5 TH DEFENDANT ZEDEKIAH ORERA........................................................6 TH DEFENDANT ELIJAH MIKWA..............................................................7 TH DEFENDANT JAMES OGENDI..............................................................8 TH DEFENDANT NATHAN ONDEGO........................................................9 TH DEFENDANT GEORGE OKELLO......................................................10 TH DEFENDANT ARTHUR AMIGA.........................................................11 TH DEFENDANT RULING 1. By an application dated 08th October, 2019 filed on 09th October, 2019, the Plaintiff/ Applicant prays for orders THAT: 1) That this Honourable court be pleased to make an order of transfer to this court for hearing and final determination of the following matters: i. KISUMU CMCC No. 543 of 2018 Tom Olendo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others ii. HAMISI SRMCC. No. 15 of 2019 Stephen Karigu & Others Vs Patrick Lihanda & Others iii. HAMISI SRMCC. No. 81 of 2018 Rev. George Okello v Trustees PAG Pastors and Staff Provident Fund iv. MILIMANI CMCC. No. 1899 of 2019 Isaac Mjete vs Elkana Salamba & 3 Others v. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 123 of 2019 Albert Asigo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others

page 1 of 3

vi. KISII CMCC. No. 156 of 2019 Bernard Mogusu & Others Vs James Ogendi & Others vii. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 157 of 2019 Antony Kinyakisa vs Patrick Lihanda viii. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 158 of 2019 Fred Oluhano vs Patrick Lihanda ix. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 159 of 2019 Patrick Asigo vs Patrick Lihanda x. KISUMU CMCC No. 421 of 2018 Antony Kinyakisa vs Patrick Lihanda 2. An order be issued staying the Order made in KISUMU CMCC No. 543 of 2018 Tom Olendo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others; HAMISI SRMCC. No. 15 of 2019 Stephen Karigu & Others Vs Patrick Lihanda & Others and VIHIGA PMCC. No. 123 of 2019 Albert Asigo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others 3. 2nd, 9th, 10th and 11th Defendants be injuncted by themselves, their servants, assigns, agents, servants and or whosoever claiming through them from accessing, withdrawing and/or dealing with A/C No. 995850100004069 at Bank of Baroda Kisumu Branch in the name of PAG-K PAG Pastors and Staff Provident Fund 2. The application is based on the grounds among others that the Defendants have filed a multiplicity of suits in the subordinate courts disregard of the PAG Church Constitution (1998), the subordinate courts have been issuing contradictory orders with a potential of bringing the dignity and integrity of the court into disrepute. 3. The application is supported by an affidavit sworn by the Plaintiff on 08 th October, 2019 in which he reiterates the grounds on the face of the application. 4. The 1st, 2nd, 8th, 9th, 10th and 11th Defendants have opposed the application and the suit on the basis of the Grounds of Opposition dated 14th October, 2019 and filed on 17th October, 2019 mainly on the ground that a ruling made in Kakamega Constitutional Petition No. 06 of 2018 consolidated most of the matters between the parties. In his replying affidavit sworn on 16 th October, 2019, the 1st Defendant reiterates the grounds of opposition and further states that some of the cases have been withdrawn. He further avers that HCCA NO. 28 OF 2019 arising from KISUMU CMCC No. 543 of 2018 Tom Olendo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others and further that an application for stay of execution of the orders in John Juma & 2 others v Patrick Lihanda & another; Zedekiah Orera & 4 others (Interested Parties) [2018] eKLR (Kakamega Constitutional Petition No. 06 of 2018) is pending at the Court of Appeal in HCCA NO. 28 OF 2019. 5. The 5th Defendant by his replying affidavit sworn on 16th October, 2019 avers that this suit is sub judice due to existence of suits and applications with similar reliefs and the same subject matter. 6. I have considered the application in the light of the supporting affidavits, the responses and written submission by the parties. 7. It has been conceded that there are other cases pending before different courts filed by other parties against the Applicant and others by various parties most of whom are parties to this suit. 8. Flowing from the existence of multiplicity of suits with similar reliefs and the same subject matter, Njagi J in John Juma & 2 others v Patrick Lihanda & another; Zedekiah Orera & 4 others (Interested Parties) (Kakamega Constitutional Petition No. 06 of 2018 ) (above) stated as follows: “The issues raised in this petition and other suits filed by other parties raises fundamentally similar issues. The multiplicity of suits filed by different parties have the potential to embarrass the judicial process if handled by different courts as the courts might issue conflicting orders.” 9. The foregoing order is still in force and I associate myself with that finding. The High Court in Kakamega is already seized of most of the matters between the parties herein and this information is within the knowledge of the Plaintiff. 10. The Plaintiff’s action of filing another suit in total disregard of the orders in John Juma & 2 others v Patrick Lihanda & another; Zedekiah Orera & 4 others (Interested Parties) (Kakamega Constitutional Petition No. 06 of 2018) (above) not only complicates issues but also leaves the court in no doubt that he is not displaying good faith and is bent on abusing the court process. 11. I therefore find that it would be prudent and in the interest of justice to have the matters herein transferred to that High Court in Kakamega for hearing and determination in John Juma & 2 others v Patrick Lihanda & another; Zedekiah Orera & 4 others (Interested Parties) (Kakamega Constitutional Petition No. 06 of 2018) (above). 12. It is therefore hereby ordered that: 1) An order be and is hereby issued transferring: i. KISUMU CMCC No. 543 of 2018 Tom Olendo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others

page 2 of 3

ii. HAMISI SRMCC. No. 15 of 2019 Stephen Karigu & Others Vs Patrick Lihanda & Others iii. HAMISI SRMCC. No. 81 of 2018 Rev. George Okello v Trustees PAG Pastors and Staff Provident Fund iv. MILIMANI CMCC. No. 1899 of 2019 Isaac Mjete vs Elkana Salamba & 3 Others v. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 123 of 2019 Albert Asigo vs Patrick Lihanda & Others vi. KISII CMCC. No. 156 of 2019 Bernard Mogusu & Others Vs James Ogendi & Others vii. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 157 of 2019 Antony Kinyakisa vs Patrick Lihanda viii. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 158 of 2019 Fred Oluhano vs Patrick Lihanda ix. VIHIGA PMCC. No. 159 of 2019 Patrick Asigo vs Patrick Lihanda x. KISUMU CMCC No. 421 of 2018 Antony Kinyakisa vs Patrick Lihanda to the High Court in Kakamega for hearing and determination in Kakamega Constitutional Petition No. 06 of 2018. 2). The Plaintiff shall bear the costs of this application 3). Orders accordingly. DATED AND SIGNED IN KISUMU THIS 04th DAY OF February 2020 T. W. CHERERE JUDGE Read in open court in the presence ofCourt Assistant - Amondi/Okodoi For Petitioner - Ms. Owino/Mr. Mbegi For 1st, 8th, 9th, 10th Respondents - Mr. Ondego/Mr. Wasilwa For 2nd,3rd, 4th and 5th Respondents - Mr. Ondego For 6th, 7th and 11th Respondents - Mr. Ondego/Mr. Odinga

page 3 of 3

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.