Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Cecilia Namsi Munyiri & Others v HFC Limited & Another

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT NAIROBI COMMERCIAL & TAX DIVISION, MILIMANI HCCC NO. E026 OF 2018 CECILIA NAMSI MUNYIRI............................1ST PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT PAUL MUNYIRI KAGUAMBO.......................2ND PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT NAMSI LIMITED..............................................3RD PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT VERSUS HOUSING FINANCE COMPANY OF KENYA LIMITED...............................1ST DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT KEYSIAN TRADERS AUCTIONEERS..2ND DEFENDANT/RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Notice of Motion of 28th January 2019 seeks the following prayers:1. Clause 6 of the Consent Order issued on 30th May 2018, by this Honourable Court, be enforced. 2. The costs of this Application be borne by the 1st, 2nd and 3rd Applicants. 2. The entire consent of 30th May 2018 reads as follows:By consent of Counsel for the 1 st, 2nd and 3rd Applicants and Counsel for the 1 st Defendant/Respondent it is hereby agreed that:1. That the amount of Kshs.1.5 Million held in Namsi Interiors Limited Account Number 1000067039 with HFC be transferred immediately to Namsi Ltd Loan account to reduce the outstanding loan arears of Kshs.2.6 Million. 2. That the applicant pay a monthly amount of Kshs.246,000/= to clear the outstanding arrears together with the monthly payments of Kshs.247,057/= as per the charge. 3. That HFC upon verification of any amounts owed to Namsi Interiors Ltd shall consider a set off of the outstanding loan arrears. 4. That the Plaintiff shall bear the costs of the application and the Auctioneers fees as per scale provided under the law. 5. That the Respondents shall immediately call of the Auction due today by Keysian Auctioneers. 6. That in default of the above, execution to issue in 45 days and joint valuation be conducted by Llyod Masika within 30 days of the default, costs to be borne by the Applicants. 7. That the Applicants be allowed to extract and serve the hand written notes/consent as orders of the Honourable Court.

page 1 of 2

3. It is common ground that enforcement of clause 6 would be contingent to clause 3 of the Consent. 4. In the affidavit of Eunice Kamau sworn on 28 th January 2019, the Bank takes the position that it verified the accounts of Namsi Interiors Ltd and communicated the same to the Plaintiffs’ lawyers in a letter of 11 th July 2018 which is reproduced below: Wednesday, July 11, 2018 Okatch & Partners Advocates, NAIROBI Dears Sirs, RE: HCCC NO. E026 OF 2018 CECILIA NAMSI MUNYIRI & OTHERS –VSHFC LIMITED & ANOTHER YOUR REF: 0 & P/479/2017 We refer to the above matter and your letter dated 9th July 2018. Pursuant to the Consent Order issued on 30th May 2018, our client has since complied with the same. We refer you to our client’s letter dated 10th July 2018 (copy enclosed). Further to the above and in compliance with Clause 3 of the Court’s Order, our client has since interrogated your client’s account. Our client does not owe any sums to yours. What is outstanding, as mine flags, is settlement of yours of professional fees. The invoice will be generated pretty soon. Yours faithfully EDWIN ABUYA Cc: Legal Officer – Litigation HFC Limited NAIROBI. 5. On the other hand, the 1st Plaintiff asserts that the Bank has frustrated the conduct of joint verification of the amount owed to the 3 rd Defendant and has taken a position that contradicts an earlier one that the Bank owed them some money. 6. I have looked at the consent and reproduced the clause around which the dispute revolves. The consent empowered the Bank to verify if any amounts were owed by it to Namsi Interiors Ltd. There was no obligation for a joint verification. A consent is a contract and that is what the Plaintiffs signed up to. The case of the Bank is that it has verified the account and nothing is owing from it to the Namsi. Having made this communication to the Plaintiffs, then they had carried out their duty under the terms of the consent and since default persists then the default clause kicks in. 7. For that reason, I allow the Notice of Motion dated 28th January 2019 with costs. Dated, Signed and Delivered in Court at Nairobi this 7th Day of February 2020 F. TUIYOTT JUDGE PRESENT: Kamwami for 1st Respondent No appearance for Plaintiffs Court Assistant: Nixon

page 2 of 2

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.