REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT SIAYA CRIMINAL REVISION NO. 32 OF 2020 (CORAM: R. E. ABURILI - J.) GORDON OWUOR LAMEK......................................................APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC.............................................................................RESPONDENT (Being an Application for revision of sentence vide Principal Magistrate’s Court, Bondo Criminal Case No. 46 of 2020 dated 21.1.2020 before Hon. S. Mathenge, Resident Magistrate) RULING 1. On 21/1/2020, the convict Gordon Owuor Lameck was convicted on his own plea of guilty for the offence of stealing contrary to Section 268 as read with Section 275 of the Penal Code. He was sentenced to serve 7 months imprisonment. He was found guilty of stealing a school bag valued at Kshs. 1,500/=. 2. In his mitigation, he said that he would not repeat the offence. He is a first offender. No Probation report was called for and I am unable to call for the same owing to the fact that probation officers are unable to access prisons to interview the inmates due to the necessary restrictions brought about by the outbreak of the COVID-19 global pandemioc. However, the Officer Incharge G.K. Prison Siaya did submit a report to this court upon request, saying that the convict is generally good only that he is easily influenced. 3. For the above reason, albeit the convict has served only 2 months in prison of the 7 months imprisonment imposed on him, I exercise discretion and suspend the remainder of the prison term and order for the release of the convict from prison in a bid to decongest prison and warn the convict Gordon Owuor Lamek not to reoffend in the next six months or be recommitted to complete sentence. 4. Orders accordingly. Dated, signed and Delivered at Siaya, this 20th Day of March, 2020. R.E. ABURILI JUDGE
A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.