Skip to content
AI-generated case briefs sourced from Kenya Law · Not legal advice
Original judgment

Busia County Persons With Disability Network & 4 others v Iebc & 2 others

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT BUSIA CONSTITUTIONAL PETITION NO. 1 OF 2018 BUSIA COUNTY PERSONS WITH DISABILITY NETWORK......................1ST PETITIONER RONALD ONYANGO OBIERO .......................2ND PETITIONER MICHAEL MAKETSO.......................................3RD PETITIONER GRACE AJUNE ONG’ARIA .............................4TH PETITIONER GRACE AKULOBA WANGATIA ..................5TH PETITTIONER AND IEBC......................................................................1 ST RESPONDENT THE CHAIRMAN IEBC....................................2ND RESPONDENT THE CERK OF ASSEMBLY OF BUSIA..........3RD RESPONDENT RULING 1. The issue of jurisdiction has been raised in this matter and the petitioners/respondents admitted that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the issues therein. This is not new. The same matter was before High Court of Kenya at Kisumu in Petition No.7 of 2017. That petition was struck out for want of jurisdiction. Justice Majanja addressed the issue of jurisdiction adequately. Instead of the petitioners filing the matter in Chief Magistrate’s Court, they filed the same in the High court contrary to the ruling of Majanja J. 2. An issue of res judicata has been raised by the respondents. This is an issue that can be addressed by the court with the requisite jurisdiction. The Court of Appeal in the case of Owners of the Motor Vessel “Lillian S” v Caltex Oil (Kenya) Ltd [1989] KLR 1 (Justice Nyarangi) while addressing the issue of jurisdiction stated: I think that it is reasonably plain that a question of jurisdiction ought to be raised at the earliest opportunity and the court seized of the matter is then obliged to decide the issue right away on the material before it. Jurisdiction is everything. Without it, a court has no power to make one more step. Where a court has no jurisdiction, there would be no basis for a continuation of proceedings pending other evidence. A court of law downs tools in respect of the matter before it the moment it holds the opinion that it is without jurisdiction. 3. I do not wish to reinvent the wheel. I am therefore making an order that this matter be struck out for want of jurisdiction. Since the petitioners did not heed the previous ruling, they will shoulder the costs herein. DELIVERED and SIGNED at BUSIA this 8th day of April, 2020 KIARIE WAWERU KIARIE JUDGE

A note on accuracy. These pages are generated automatically from our AI-written case briefs and have not been checked by a lawyer. Case titles and citations come from Kenya Law; the counts, topics, propositions and “treatment” labels are derived from the briefs and can be incomplete or wrong. Use them as a research aid and always read the original judgment before relying on anything here. This is not legal advice.